The handoff between submission intake and underwriter review.
Insurance operations run on high document volumes, defined business rules, and repeatable workflows. Those are the conditions where AI agents produce measurable results without touching core systems. Claims intake, underwriting submissions, policy renewals, and premium audits follow predictable patterns that your existing platforms manage today. AI coordinates the handoffs between those platforms and routes exceptions to the people who need to act on them.
A 2026 AM Best survey of more than 150 rated carriers and MGAs found that fewer than 20% consider their organizations at an advanced stage of AI implementation, despite nearly 60% expecting significant transformation within three years. The carriers closing that gap are not replacing core systems. They are deploying AI that reads documents, verifies data, and executes handoffs on top of the infrastructure already in place.
Adjusters manually extract data from submitted documents, verify coverage, and route cases before any assessment begins. Up to 40% of claims and underwriting staff time goes to non-core administrative tasks (Accenture).
Underwriting teams receive broker submissions in inconsistent formats and manually extract data, check completeness, and triage by risk priority before pricing begins. Backlogs here extend quote turnaround times directly.
Renewal preparation requires pulling loss history and generating documentation for each expiring policy. Mid-term change requests typically queue in email for days before a policy service representative processes them.
Audit coordinators contact policyholders, collect supporting documents, reconcile figures, and update billing records. The same rule set applies every time, consuming four to six staff hours per audit.
Compliance teams manually pull data from claims, policy, and finance systems across multiple states to meet regulatory filing deadlines on a fixed schedule.
| Good Fit | Not a Good Fit |
|---|---|
| Your claims, underwriting, or policy operations run on repeatable workflows with defined business rules. | Your core policy or claims system is mid-implementation and your data is not yet stable. |
| You have volume in at least one process (renewals, audits, or submissions) that your team handles manually on a consistent rule set. | You want to fully automate decisions requiring adjuster or underwriter judgment with no human oversight at the exception level. |
| Your systems are in place and you want intelligence layered on top of them, not a replacement. | You expect AI to resolve data quality problems created by disconnected legacy systems before those gaps are addressed. |
| You are ready to pilot one process in a real environment before committing to broader deployment. | You have not defined what a successful outcome looks like for a pilot in your operation. |
Before: An underwriter spends 45 to 90 minutes per submission manually extracting data from broker materials and entering it into the underwriting system before any risk assessment begins. Quote turnaround extends to five or more business days during high-volume periods.
After: An AI agent handles extraction, validation, and system entry. The underwriter starts risk assessment from a pre-populated submission summary in under 15 minutes, and standard submissions reach quote in one to two business days.
Before: An audit coordinator tracks document collection by email, reconciles figures manually in a spreadsheet, and updates billing records for each commercial audit. Each audit consumes four to six staff hours spread across two to three weeks.
After: An AI agent sends requests, collects documents, extracts figures, and delivers a completed reconciliation summary ready for review. Staff time per audit drops to under one hour.
Figures shown are representative of outcomes in comparable implementations.
Representative screens showing how AI agents surface data and present decisions to your staff. Click any card to see the full view.
FNOL Voice Agent
First notice of loss captured by voice, claim record opened in your system, and initial policyholder communication triggered.
Premium Audit Agent
Audit documents collected, figures extracted, and billing reconciliation summary delivered for auditor review.
Underwriting Submission
Broker submissions extracted from ACORD forms and emails, scored by completeness, and delivered to the underwriter.
Tayana runs AI Foundation Training with your claims, underwriting, or operations team before any solution is proposed. Participants identify their own process candidates and define what a successful pilot outcome looks like for their operation.
Tayana assesses your selected process: how the current workflow runs, where the data lives, what business rules govern exceptions, and what your systems can expose for integration. You receive a written assessment with a specific pilot recommendation.
One process. One agent. Your real systems and your real data. The pilot produces a working agent in production with documented performance results and a clear basis for deciding whether to expand the deployment further. Pilot investment starts at $10,000.
AI agents connect to your existing systems through APIs or structured data outputs and act on data those systems already hold. No changes to your core policy administration or claims platform are required to begin.
A single-process pilot typically runs from first engagement to a working agent in six to eight weeks. The timeline assumes defined business rules and accessible, structured data in the target process.
Processes with high document volume and consistent business rules produce the fastest results. Claims intake, underwriting submissions, policy renewals, premium audits, and endorsement processing are the most common starting points.
Pilot investment starts at $10,000 and scales with process complexity and the number of system connections required. Tayana scopes and confirms cost before any work begins.
Poor data quality and scope that is too broad for a first deployment account for most failures. Starting with one process that has clean, accessible data and defined rules reduces both risks significantly.
In most cases, no. Agents connect through APIs or structured exports that your current systems already support. Tayana confirms integration feasibility during the readiness assessment before any pilot is scoped.
Tayana builds human-in-the-loop checkpoints into every agent where coverage or compliance decisions are involved. Final decisions remain with underwriters, adjusters, and compliance staff and are documented in your existing systems of record.
Most pilots produce measurable time savings within the first 90 days of production. Full ROI typically takes six to twelve months, depending on the volume of the automated process and how quickly the deployment expands.
Book a thirty-minute call. We will confirm whether your situation is a fit and what the right starting point is, whether that is the AI Adoption Accelerator, a readiness assessment, or a direct pilot.